On the discrete question of whether some sanction is warranted, Plaintiff’s showing is stronger:
- Undisputed Non‑Service Window – Defendant does not deny that the Reply/Opposition reached Plaintiff after the court’s action; his “clerk rejection” explanation does not negate the signature‑equals‑service rule.
- Rule‑Based Violation vs. Technical Filing Error – The service failure is clearer and more concrete than Defendant’s claim that Plaintiff packaged motions incorrectly.
Prejudice is Demonstrated, not Speculative – A ruling entered without adversary input is precisely the harm Rule 9A seeks to avoid.
Comments are closed